|
|
|
CHINESE
HIGHBINDERS |
|
Harper’s
Weekly, February 13, 1886, page 103 (Illustrated
Article) |
|
|
|
The
Chinese Quarter of San Francisco has been aptly termed a bit of old
China. With its shops resplendent with Oriental red and yellow, its
pagoda-like restaurants, its narrow, noisome alleys, its
under-ground opium and gambling dens, it furnishes a picture in
miniature of the seamy side of life in a Chinese city. But what most
writers forget is that Chinatown in the far Western metropolis
represents mainly the worst features of Mongolian life, and is as
unfair a type of comparison as Mulberry or Baxter Street to-day
would be of the life of New York. Nine-tenths of the dwellers in San
Francisco’s Chinatown are coolies, ranking as virtual slaves in
their own country, and doomed from birth to menial labor of the
coarsest kind. No Chinese of rank would tolerate one of them as his
body-servant or would permit one to work in any capacity in his
household. Outside the Chinese Consulate in San Francisco it is
doubtful whether one would be able to find a score of Chinese of
good family or breeding among the 20,000 herded in Chinatown.
Gathered in this way, is it any wonder that the coolies in
California include many criminals? Could one take 20,000 white men
from the slums of any great city and secure a higher order of
intelligence or sobriety than is shown by these pigtailed heathen? |
|
|
|
|
|
When the
Chinese began to flock to California in large numbers, attracted by
gold mining and the promise of work on the overland railroad, they
formed for mutual protection what are known as the Six Companies.
These were fashioned on the principle of trade guilds. The men from
Canton, for instance, formed one company, those from Hong-Kong
another. The members paid regular dues, for which the society
furnished them hospital care when sick, and guaranteed that their
bones should be carefully transported to China in case of death.
They were also to be aided in any difficulty with Chinese of other
companies or with whites. The company rooms were the head-quarters
for the members, where they could get the latest news from China.
Outgrowths of these companies, but independent of them, are the
Highbinders’ societies. These are purely American institutions,
like the Six Companies, without counterpart in the old country. They
are many in number, and their strength, and the desperate character
of their active members, and the swift vengeance which they have
dealt out to offenders, have made them feared throughout the Pacific
coast. Though known as Freemasons, the Highbinders are really banded
together for black-mail and police purposes. If by any factor the
confidence of a Highbinder is won, he will have no hesitation in
acknowledging that he lives by black-mail. He regards his calling as
perfectly legitimate, and in carrying out the orders of his society
he would stop at no crime, for he looks on the murder of one who has
violated the secrets of his society, or who has received its
sentence, as a meritorious bit of work. |
|
|
|
|
|
The mother
society among the Highbinders is the Chee Kung Tong, which occupies
a substantial three-story building on Spofford Alley, in the heart
of the Chinese Quarter of San Francisco. The society owns the
building and is regularly incorporated. Ascending a flight of
stairs, one comes to the large assembly-hall, a room sixty by
twenty-five feet, well furnished in Chinese style. Around the sides
of the room are ranged heavy carved oak chairs, the wood of which
looks like ebony in shadow, and in strong light shows the rich color
of old rose-wood. In the centre of the room is a table, and at one
side are arrangements for making tea. On the walls are hung Chinese
paintings and mottoes from Confucius. Just at the head of the stair
way is a long tablet of boxwood, on which are inscribed the names of
the 1200 charter members of the society, with the amounts which they
originally contributed. In the rear of the apartment is a small
office which contains the usual couch, covered with clean matting
and provided with an opium layout; on the walls are the names of the
officers and of the police force for the half-year. Four
"headmen" are elected semiannually, whose word is law, as
well as thirty-three "hatchet-men," as the guard detailed
to execute the decrees of the society is called. The Chee Kung is
the most powerful of all the societies, and has 4500 members in San
Francisco, and 15,000 in all the American colonies where Chinese
have penetrated. Their rolls show that they have branches in 390
towns in the United States, Spanish American, and Cuba. A singular
fact is that many members of the minor societies still belong to the
Chee Kung. |
|
|
|
|
|
The
initiation for membership is very rigid, and has been witnessed by a
few American detectives in whom the Chinese have learned to place
confidence. The candidate kneels and, with a large Chinese sword
placed across his throat, and the point of another pressed against
the nape of his neck, joins in the chanting of an oath before the
sacred symbols of the society—an oath which binds him to obey the
society, to renounce all ties of kindred, and to swear to obey its
commands without question at any time. Trials of accused persons are
held at stated intervals, and the sentence is executed on the spot.
The implement of punishment resembles a saw-horse—a log about six
feet long, with four short legs. Over this the victim is bound, and
the executioner, with a club which resembles a base-ball bat, gives
the requisite number of blows on the back and legs. On the floor
above where this torture is practiced is the joss of the society. |
|
|
|
|
|
The
influence of the head society is far-reaching, and it is doubtful
whether its leaders would heed any order from a lesser source than
the Chinese Consul. It is even said that the Consul’s order has
sometimes been overruled, as there are men in the Chee Kung Tong who
acknowledge no allegiance to China. The doctrine is that the society
must be obeyed first. So when the Council of Judges decide that a
Chinese has committed an act which merits death, the hatchet-men are
instructed to kill him wherever found. If he escapes from San
Francisco, there is small prospect of evading his pursuers, as his
name and description are sent to all the 390 branch organizations
throughout the country. It is dangerous for any Chinaman to harbor
the fugitive or aid him in any way. He cannot return to China unless
he is unusually clever in disguising himself, for the shipping ports
are closely watched by the society’s agents. This sleepless
espionage undermines the courage of the bravest man. It is through
terror of this fearful menace that so many reputable Chinese become
members of the society. Outside the Chee Kung they would be targets
for black-mail; inside the circle, they are protected from all harm. |
|
|
|
|
|
The lesser
societies of Highbinders in San Francisco have from 200 to 600
members each. Their lodge-rooms are fitted up plainly, though each
is a copy of the original so far as the joss is concerned.
Naturally these societies become
nests of criminals. The hatchet-men are usually outlaws. Even the
best of the Chinese have small regard for human life, as their laws
tolerate the purchase of a substitute by a wealthy criminal
condemned to execution, and the compromise of a murder by a money
payment to the relatives of the victim. Trained in this way, the
Highbinder is as reckless of human life as the slave-hunting Arab of
the Soudan. There have been cases of murder in Chinatown, done for
private revenge by hired Highbinders, for the small sum of twenty
dollars, and the cheapness in which human life is held by these
people is a constant marvel. The deadliness of the revenge of the
Highbinder when he fancies he has been wronged is illustrated by an
incident which occurred last year in San Francisco. A white
saloon-keeper in the Chinese Quarter, named Dempsey, resented an
insult offered to his partner’s wife by a Chinese Highbinder by
throwing the offending cooly into the street. He was warned to be on
his guard, as the man was a notorious desperado. Two days later
Dempsey, in broad daylight, while drawing a glass of beer, was
stabbed fatally by the Chinese; who coolly walked out of the saloon,
and escaped. Though the police used every effort to force the
society to give him up, the murderer still remains at large. |
|
|
|
|
|
The
Highbinder is almost entirely beyond the pale of American law. His
secret hiding-places defy the ingenuity of the police; he holds an
oath in court in contempt; he can get a score of witnesses in his
society to swear to anything which he desires; he has been the chief
cause of the difficulty in the enforcement of the Restriction Act in
San Francisco. The great body of the Chinese in California are
peaceful and law-abiding, but the few hundred active Highbinders
form a powerful element of unrest, and are a constant menace to
public safety.
Wong Ah Bang, now in San Quentin
prison for a term of ten years for assault with intent to murder,
was a Chinese Highbinder who took service as a cook in an American
family. He no doubt counted on robbing the family when a convenient
opportunity occurred, but in the mean time he was offered a good sum
to kill a Chinese. He killed the man, and the circumstantial
evidence was strong against him, but the family with which he worked
testified that he could not have been absent on the night of the
murder without their knowledge, and this alibi saved him.
Subsequently he attempted another murder, and was caught, and
convicted on January 20, 1883.
Chung Ah Kit is a professional
kidnapper of women who was sent to San Quentin for five years, in
1882, for kidnapping a Chinese girl and holding her for a large
ransom. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lee Ah
Fook is one of the ablest of the Highbinders. He belongs to the Suey
Ong Tong, and acts as interpreter for his society in the courts. He
was known to be accessory to a murder in 1880, but he escaped
through perjured testimony. His most recent exploit was to secure
the arrest of six Chinese women on the ground that they had been
illegally landed. This was done in revenge for the failure of the
owners of the women to pay him $40 a head as tribute-money. He
speaks good English, and there is a world of intelligence in his one
serviceable eye. |
|
|
|
|
|
The
weapons of the Highbinder are all brought from China, with the
exception of the hatchet and the pistol. The illustrations shows a
collection of Chinese knives and swords taken from criminals, and
now in the possession of the San Francisco police. The murderous
weapon is what is called the double sword. Two swords, each about
two feet long, are worn in a single scabbard. A Chinese draws these,
one in each hand, and chops his way through a crowd of enemies. Only
one side is sharpened, but the blade, like that of all the Chinese
knives, is ground to a razor edge. An effective weapon at close
quarters is the two-edged knife, usually worn in a leather sheath.
The handle is of brass, generally richly ornamented, while the blade
is of the finest steel. Most of the assassinations in Chinatown have
been committed with this weapon, one blow being sufficient to ensure
a mortal wound. The cleaver used by the Highbinders is smaller and
lighter than the ordinary butcher’s cleaver. The iron club, about
a foot and a half long, is enclosed in a sheath, and worn at the
side like a sword. Another weapon is a curious sword with a large
guard for the hand. The hatchet is usually of American make, but
ground as sharp as a razor. |
|
|
|
|
|
The coat
of mail shown is the sketch, which was taken from a Chinese
Highbinder, is of cloth, heavily padded with layers of rice paper
that make it proof against a bullet, or even a rifle ball. This
garment is worn by the most desperate men when they undertake a
peculiarly dangerous bit of assassination. More common than this is
the leather wristlet. This comes halfway up to the elbow, and pieces
of iron inserted in the leather serve to ward off even a heavy
stroke of a sword or hatchet. |
|
|
|
|
|
Harper’s
Weekly, February 13, 1886, page 103 (Illustrated
Article) |
|
|
|
|
|
This
site is brought to you by…
Website and all Content © 1998-1999 HarpWeek, LLC
Please report problems to webmaster@harpweek.com |