|
|
|
THE CHINESE
EXCLUSION ACT |
|
Harper’s
Weekly, October 13, 1888, page 771 (Editorial) |
|
|
|
The
President has signed the Chinese exclusion bill, but it is a bill
unworthy of the United States. The object, indeed, is proper, and
the Chinese Government had frankly expressed its willingness to
co-operate with us to prevent the immigration of Chinese laborers. A
treaty to that effect was negotiated. The Senate suggested certain
amendments, to which the Chinese Minister assumed that his
Government would agree. But before the decision of that Government
was known, a bill was hurried through Congress in desperate haste,
as if there was a pressing emergency, violating treaty stipulations
and insulting the Chinese Government, which then declined to ratify
the treaty. |
|
|
|
|
|
The
refusal, under the circumstances, was required by self-respect, and
it cannot be justly held to imply that China would not consent to an
exclusion which its Government had proposed, when arranged in a fair
and seemly manner. The whole transaction is part of the game of the
campaign, and its reflects no honor upon the American name. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This
site is brought to you by…
Website and all Content © 1998-1999 HarpWeek, LLC
Please report problems to webmaster@harpweek.com |